Christian
Heterodox: Religious Idealism in the Poetry of William Blake
An Honor's Thesis by Andrew J. Manuse
For
the Completion of his Undergraduate Studies at Niagara University
Chapter
One: God as Man - Jesus
It
can be seen that William Blake was indeed heterodox when considering his belief
in God, Jesus, and humanity. He held that all three of these concepts are united
into one reality. He coined a variety of terms for this reality, ranging from
‘The Poetic Genius’ to ‘the Imagination,’ and even ‘True
Man.’ For Blake, humanity existed as the form, or essence, of God, while
each person maintained a unique identity that emanated from this essence. While
exploring his self-made philosophy, Blake “was one who was continually
‘seeking the Eternal which is always present to the wise’”
(Ackroyd 240). He believed that the artist lives in the Eternal when he or she
uses the imagination to visualize the Spiritual realm. It is absolutely necessary
for a person to be an artist of some kind in his philosophy; for, otherwise
one cannot be a Christian. In the midst of this unorthodoxy, “Blake affirmed
his belief in the Bible and professed himself a Christian” (Hagstrum 129).
He proclaimed himself a disciple of Christ, but also a member of Christ’s
body. When speaking about the historical Jesus, he would say that “Jesus
was not only a teacher but a healer, and the true healer does not ‘cure;’
he helps the sick man to cure himself” (Frye, FSSWB 81). Thus, Blake used
the life of Jesus as an example for how all of humanity should act. Yet, Blake
would never want any person to be the historical Jesus precisely. He wanted
humanity to imaginatively visualize Jesus in the present as the power giver,
the catalyst for each individual to become his or her true self. In all of Blake’s
writing, his message is for humanity to realize that it is the essence of God
so that it can become empowered to change the world into heaven by the use of
artwork and spontaneous living.
The second series of “There is No Natural Religion” and the third
tract, “All Religions Are One,” contain Blake’s most straightforward
affirmations of who God is. Blake states as his conclusion that the incarnation
of God is eternal in all humankind. He writes, “The desire of Man being
Infinite the possession is Infinite and himself Infinite” (Blake 2). Blake
uses the present tense: “He who sees the Infinite in all things sees God.
He who sees the Ratio only, sees himself only. Therefore, God becomes as we
are, that we may be as he is” (Blake 2). In other words, God becomes human
in every man or woman, so that all humans can become God. Harold Bloom suggests
that a vision of the infinite “in all things is to see God because it
is to see as God sees, which Blake believes is the only way to see God. But
to see as God sees, man must himself be infinite, a state to be attained only
by the individual utterly possessed by the Poetic Character” (qtd. in
Erdman, PPWB 807).
The third tract, “All Religions are One,” identifies the Poetic
Genius, or the Poetic Character, as true man; it is the universal form of man,
the Christ, or God, and it is expressed in the imagination of all human beings.
Damon agrees. He says that “Blake with a customary reticence, leaves the
reader to assume that the ‘Poetic Genius’ is God … This ‘Poetic
Genius’ exists as a Universal, also as the central core of each man’s
personality” (Damon, WBHPS 37). Indeed, all humanity is one in this Poetic
Genius. In an annotation to Swedenborg’s Divine Love and Divine Wisdom,
Blake writes, “Man can have no idea of anything greater than Man as a
cup cannot contain more than its capaciousness[.] But God is a man not because
he is so perceived by man but because he is the creator of man” (Blake
592). Here the idea of a Poetic Genius becomes more apparent. Still, Blake defines
the Poetic Genius as a general form that creates a variety of different images:
“As all men are alike in outward form, So (and with the same infinite
variety) all are alike in the Poetic Genius” (Blake 2). To be an incarnation
of God, a person must live according to the truth he or she imaginatively sees
in the universal Poetic Genius. Since the Poetic Genius is the same as Divine
humanity, it can also be said that “The lesson before man is to learn
‘to adore his humanity’ – his typical being, his essence as
distinct form all else; ‘for that is God’s Spirit of Life’”
(Hamblen 383). Blake says, “No man can think or write or speak from his
heart, but he must intend truth” (Blake 2). This statement refers to a
subjective truth; each person will see the Poetic Genius in his or her own way,
and, therefore, live and think differently from the next person. In a letter
to Dr. Trusler, Blake writes, “I know that This World is a World of Imagination
and Vision … but Everybody does not see alike” (Blake 676-7). However,
even though every person does not see alike, each person in all his or her diversity
is God, or as Blake would say, the “Human Form Divine” (13). Northrup
Frye views Blake’s perspective as one that sees God and Man as one in
Jesus; for, “if the Son of God existed in eternity, God must have been
human from the beginning…. And if always human, God must have been plural,
for it is not good for either God or Man to be alone” (FSSWB 256).
In “The Laocoon” as well, Blake unveils his idea of who, or what,
God is and how He relates to humankind. First of all, Blake affirms the idea
that human beings, as animals, are only temporal and not eternal. He states,
“What can be Created Can be Destroyed / Adam is only The Natural Man and
not the Soul or Imagination” (Blake 271). Thus, human beings as creatures,
or people who only perceive the physical/natural world, are mortal and capable
of destruction. Indeed, the Natural Man lives in the state of Hell: “the
self-hood ‘jealousy’ defined by Blake as ‘the being shut up
in the possession of corporeal desires which shortly weary the man,’ and
this is the only hell that Jesus spoke of” (Frye, FSSWB 81). Yet this
is only a state of mind that can be escaped (Frye, FSSWB 80). Accordingly, Blake
is quick to say in a letter to William Hayley that “every Mortal loss
is an Immortal Gain. The Ruins of Time build Mansions in Eternity” (Blake
678). In other words, humans must leave their perception of the material world
for a more permanent reality. For, when Blake says that Adam is not the Soul
or Imagination, he sets up his idea that humans can be more than natural. This
leads to Blake’s second main idea in the Laocoon: that humans can be Spiritual
beings and, therefore, eternal. He writes: “The Eternal Body of Man is
THE IMAGINATION / that is: God Himself, The Divine Body, {Yeshua} JESUS we are
his Members” (Blake 271). According to Hagstrum, these lines proclaim
that “God is Christ, Christ is Imagination, Imagination is Man …
and all are equal and each ends up becoming the other” (130). Northrup
Frye states that when Jesus “talked of God he did not point to the sky
but told his hearers that the Kingdom of Heaven was within them [as it is not
a place but a state of mind]” (FSSWB 80). Therefore, according to Blake,
a human being who visualizes the Spiritual reality by using his or her imaginative
faculty is part of the “Eternal Body of Man,’ the “Divine
Body,” or the Body of Christ.
Blake more clearly represents this idea in “A Vision of the Last Judgment.”
He writes: “I have seen when at a distance Multitudes of Men in Harmony
appear like a single Infant sometimes in the Arms of a Female [they] <this>
represented the Church” (Blake 546). As this image represents the true
Church of Christ, it also represents the “Divine Body,” the Body
of Christ, and “the Eternal Body of Man.”
More important, however, Blake suggests that each individual person who visualizes
the Spiritual World is indeed either “God Himself” or a part of
God. This idea is clarified “in a series of conversations recorded by
the young journalist Crabb Robinson … ‘Christ he said – he
is the only God – but then he added – and so am I and so are you.’
Here, clearly stated is his belief in the Divine Humanity of which the whole
of creation partakes” (Ackroyd 325). This is repeated in “A Vision
of the Last Judgment, where Blake writes: “All things are comprehended
in their Eternal Forms in the Divine body of the Saviour ... the Images of Existences
according to [their aggregate Imaginations]” (545). Blake would say that
“the Imagination was the central faculty of both God and Man; indeed,
here the two become indistinguishable” (Damon, ABD 195). Thus, Blake’s
God is the collection of all man’s visions of God and Humanity combined.
It can then be said that Human beings who visualize the Spiritual world become
co-creators with God and contribute to his Divine nature.
Even though Blake was quick to affirm the unity of God and humanity, he still
made room for some kind of individuality in the human person. For, “only
in the individual being is life concretely ‘there’” (Leavis
81). Blake said that humanity has the same essence as God but that a person’s
identity progresses from the essence of God and is unique in itself. In one
of Blake’s annotations to Swedenborg’s Divine Love and Divine
Wisdom, he writes:
"Essence
is not Identity but from Essence proceeds Identity and from one Essence may
proceed many Identities as from one Affection may proceed many thoughts …
If the Essence was the same as the Identity there could be but one Identity.
Which is false." (Blake 593)
When Northrup Frye read this
verse, he understood that “God is not only the genius but the genus of
man, the ‘Essence’ from which proceed the individuals or ‘Identities’
mentioned” (FSSWB 31). In other words, each individual person is made
in the form of God but expressed in an infinite variety of identities or characteristics.
These identities are not separate from God, but they are distinctive in each
individual person. Furthermore, as each person is one with God, every identity
that exists becomes eternal in the Poetic Genius: “A Universal Poetic
Genius also exists, from whom the Poetic Genius in each man is derived”
(Damon, WBHPS 37). In “A Vision of the Last Judgment,” Blake writes,
“In Eternity one Thing never Changes into another Thing[,] Each Identity
is Eternal consequently” (Blake 546). Thus, Blake “was much more
ready to accept that ‘man is a microcosm, comprehending in himself partially
everything which the world contains divinely and totally’” (Ackroyd
90). In other words, when a person comes to a full understanding of himself,
he will understand everything about the divinity of the world that is possible
for him to know. Ackroyd agrees: “’Each man has the essence of God,
and all the wisdom and the power of the world within himself.’ This is
the area in which all of Blake’s beliefs also come together” (210).
At one point, Blake “alludes to ‘A Vision of the Eternal Now’
in which past and future are consumed” (Ackroyd 107). In this concept,
Blake suggests that each person should come to an understanding of his or her
identity in the present, and reflect on how that identity emanates forth from
the very reality of God. He implies that once this is accomplished, a person
can utilize the power that comes from his or her essence and become a fully
actualized individual.
Blake puts love above all else as the most important element of the universal
Poetic Genius that emanates into every individual person. In “The Divine
Image,” Blake writes,
"For Mercy Pity Peace and Love,
Is God our father dear: …
Is Man his ch[i]ld and care …
And Love, the human form divine" (Blake 12)
In these lines, it can be seen that God’s attributes, “Mercy Pity
Peace and Love,” are also Man’s attributes. Indeed, he even goes
so far as to suggest that these attributes are God and Man. This is possible
in his definition of the Imagination, wherein humanity envisions eternity in
the present and lives according to the Divinity within itself. Blake is careful
to emphasize “Love” as “the human form divine.” In other
words, Love is the most sacred of all Divine attributes. In one of his annotations
to Swedenborg’s Divine Love and Divine Wisdom, Blake writes,
“He who Loves feels love descend into him and if he has wisdom may perceive
it is from the Poetic genius which is the Lord” (592). Here, Blake is
saying that love, originating with the universal Divinity, begets more love
eternally. Surely this is the most uplifting image of God imaginable.
The above lines illustrate who and what God is and how an individual person
relates to His reality, but they do not explain how one lives as or in God.
The following lines give some indication of what an imaginative person may do
to co-create with God:
"It manifests itself in his
Works of Art (In Eternity All is Vision)
All that we See is VISION from Generated Organs gone as soon as come[.] Permanent
in The Imagination; considered as Nothing by the NATURAL MAN" (Blake 271)
Blake’s God manifests “itself” (becomes evident, is readily
perceived) in man’s “Works of Art.” All that man has to do
is see and believe that what he sees is eternal in the Spiritual, or Imaginative
realm. Then, he must create art in any form to express the eternal vision that
he saw. Accordingly, “Man in his creative acts and perceptions is God,
and God is Man, God is the eternal Self, and the worship of God is self-development
… in his creative activity the artist expresses the creative activity
of God, so all creators are contained in the Creator” (Frye, FSSWB 30).
The following is one of Blake’s visions, from “A Vision of the Last
Judgment,” that expresses how one may use art or language to express eternal
vision: “What it will be Questioned When the Sun rises[:] do you not see
a round Disk of fire somewhat like a Guinea[.] O no no I see an Innumerable
company of the Heavenly host crying Holy Holy Holy is the Lord God Almighty[.]
I question not my Corporeal or Vegetative Eye any more than I would Question
a Window concerning a Sight I look thro it and not with it” (Blake 555).
In this vision, Blake uses his physical organs to imaginatively see the Spiritual
world. He would say that this vision is a testament to his membership in the
Body of Christ. For, “the language of the Bible proclaims loudly that
Jesus possessed and possesses a body. It is called a ‘temple’ as
the body of his followers, for in his role as Redeemer he is also ‘the
Savior of the body’ … Christians are mystically regarded as the
several members of his one body” (Hagstrum 130). Thus, as a member, he
is also God revealing a vision of Himself to the rest of the Human Body Divine.
According to S. Foster Damon, “Vision,” for Blake, “is the
perception of the human in all things. All nature is a projection of ourselves.
‘As a man is So he Sees.’ Each person sees the universe in his own
way” (ABD 436). Thus, a person must cultivate his vision in order to understand
himself and the universe as a whole. In Blake’s vision of the rising sun,
he understands nature as the image of the Spiritual World that pays tribute
to God throughout eternity.
In Blake’s philosophy, art becomes the whole purpose for existence: “The
whole Business of Man is the Arts and All Things Common” (Blake 271).
Northrup Frye agrees: “Blake’s view of art could almost be defined
as the attempt to realize the religious vision in human society” (BTA
8). It is also relevant that Blake writes, “I must now express to you
my conviction that all is come from the spiritual World for Good and not for
Evil” in a letter to Thomas Butts (Blake 700). Here, Blake suggests that
any Imaginative vision a person has, expresses as art, or shares with others
is for the good of humanity. This belief can be quite an encouragement for a
young artist worried about the affect he or she will have on the world. Believing
in the positive affect of all art, a person who cultivates his vision and imaginatively
understands what he sees as a projection of the God within himself, can create
art that expresses himself to others. In other words, a person who shares his
or her art with others can show that person God in a new way. To Blake, “art
seemed to show heaven in the world, and the world in heaven; from his later
reading he also came to believe that heaven longs to see itself in material
form, while the world aspires to be reunited with its spiritual essence”
(Ackroyd 56). Thus, for Blake, performing artwork is not only an expression
of God, it is the action that brings about unity with God. Furthermore, since
insights “come as soon as go,” expressing them as artwork and sharing
them with others is the way Blake would suggest they become eternal in the imagination.
In a letter to Flaxman, Blake writes, “The Kingdom of this World are now
become the Kingdoms of God and his Christ, and we shall reign with him for ever
and ever. The Reign of Literature and the Arts Commences” (Blake 686-7).
It is in the same light that Blake says, “Art is the Tree of LIFE GOD
is JESUS (Blake 271). Art becomes the purpose for life and the way that life
is continued. It becomes the lifeblood of the Kingdom of God. It feeds the Imagination,
the Eternal Man, God, Jesus, and the lives of every human being. It is only
the “Natural Man” who does not see the Spiritual realm, or does
not share in the creation and understanding of artwork. Blake suggests that
such people do not use their imaginative faculty and are in danger of losing
eternity. In a letter to Thomas Butts, he writes, “If Great things do
not turn out it is because such things depend on the Spiritual and not on the
Natural World” (Blake 688).
It seems as though the creation and distribution of art was indeed Blake’s
religion. In “The Laocoon,” he writes:
"Prayer is the Study of Art
Praise is the Practice of Art
Fasting &c. all relate to Art
The outward Ceremony is Antichrist
Without Unceasing Practice nothing else can be done" (Blake 272)
Here, Blake uses religious terms to illustrate the way he thinks God should
be worshipped. For Blake, “Prayer is the Study of Art” because one
person can study the art of another and see God in the vision of this other
person. “Praise is the Practice of Art” because creating art requires
one to see God in one’s own vision first, before a work can be created.
Practicing art also requires one to share it with other people. Any agreement
between artist and observer gives credence to the vision of God seen by the
artist. For, “the more unified the perception, the more real the existence”
(Frye, FSSWB 21). Yet, “Perception is meaningless without an imaginative
ordering of it” (Frye, FSSWB 25). Thus agreement between artist and observer
must be imaginative for it to affirm truth. “Fasting” can relate
to art because extended fasting may help a person to see visions, or hallucinate.
In an annotation to Swedenborg’s Divine Love and Divine Wisdom,
Blake writes, “The Whole of the New Church is in the Active Life and not
in Ceremonies at all” (595). Blake denies the “outward ceremony”
of traditional religion as the Antichrist. More directly, Blake is denying ritual,
religious traditions, and pomp and circumstance as against the teachings of
Christ because they become habit and hinder vision.
The active life for Blake has something to do with his statement that true “Christianity
is Art” and “Jesus and his Apostles and Disciples were all Artists”
(Blake 271). This is to say that Jesus and his followers, past and present,
were all inspired by imagination while living in vision. For, “Christ
did not hide his thoughts but transformed them into acts” (Erdman, BPAE
277). According to Blake, Art is the mode of life for the Godly man or woman,
the follower of Jesus, and Jesus himself. Blake suggests that art must be an
“Unceasing Practice;” it must be lived out in every day life and
created anew at every opportunity. According to Ackroyd, “The Spirit said
to him ‘Blake be an artist and nothing else. In this there is felicity’”
(37). Correspondingly, Blake said that if a man or woman is not “A Poet
a Painter a Musician an Architect” he or she “is not a Christian”
(Blake 272). Despite the idea that Blake’s terms are meant to be taken
as broad titles under which many types of art may fall, anyone not revealing
Imagination, or God, through artwork of some kind is not living according to
the Divine Plan (Damon, ABD 28-29). Blake would say that the more man imaginatively
creates, the more pleasure results, and the more God is expanded in humanity.
Perhaps this is because of his belief that “nothing was ever forgotten
or abandoned, but remained in the continual present of his [own] creative labors”
(Ackroyd 119). Blake believed that the creation of artwork was conducted in
the Eternal Now, where true reality exists. This corresponds with the use of
imaginative vision that he suggests is the only way to see the Spiritual realm.
He would say that a person can look into the reality of God or the Poetic Genius
in the Eternal Now through his or her imaginative perception of art and life
in general.
Blake goes on to further illustrate the function and nature of art as imaginative
vision in “A Vision of the Last Judgment.” He says, “The Last
Judgment is not Fable or Allegory but Vision[.] Fable or Allegory are a totally
distinct and inferior kind of Poetry. Vision or Imagination is a Representation
of what Eternally Exists” (Blake 544). Thus, for Blake, the story of the
Last Judgment is not an allegory for something that will occur in the future,
it is eternal and occurs throughout the lives of every human being, and God.
For, “Everything is to be exalted; the least event glorified; and the
whole will be organized into one harmonious life” (Damon, WBHPS 142).
Everything that occurs in every human’s life is eternal in the imagination;
“it is the Divine bosom into which we shall all go after the death of
the Vegetated body” (Blake 545). Yet, “This World <of Imagination>
is Infinite and Eternal” (Blake 545); it is also present and perceivable
during life in the “Vegetated body.” John Beer confirms this idea:
“Blake is equally urgent that men should remind themselves of Eternity
– but affirms that Eternity is constantly manifest here and now in this
world” (265).
Blake also links his ideas on art to Scripture itself. He writes: “The
Hebrew Bible and the Gospel of Jesus are not Allegory but Eternal Vision or
Imagination of All that Exists” (Blake 544). In “The Laocoon,”
Blake writes, “The Old and New Testaments are the Great Code of Art”
(Blake 271). In this designation, Blake implies that all eternal forms are represented
in the Bible: “The Bible is the vehicle of revealed religion because it
is a unified vision of human life” (Frye, FSSWB 45). As “the Great
Code of Art” it illustrates the way that all art should be composed in
order to represent the eternal. It also serves as a guide for living under this
title. Yet, Blake would say it is only a guide in the imagination: “The
Bible tells the artist what the function of art is and what his creative powers
are trying to accomplish” (Frye, BTA 13). In other words, a person can
only learn from the Bible by envisioning it in a subjective way or by understanding
it in his or her own heart and mind.
Correspondingly, Blake proclaims his unorthodox views of Jesus, compared to
standard Christianity, in what Erdman editorially positions as the last stanza
of “The Everlasting Gospel.” This stanza serves as a powerful conclusion
to Blake’s ideas about Jesus included in this work, yet, it may do more
justice here as an introduction. Blake writes: “The Vision of Christ that
thou dost see / Is my Visions Greatest Enemy” (Blake 516). The word “thou”
refers to either Christians at large or, more likely, the institutional orthodox
Christian church. Here, Blake strongly suggests that he is opposed to the orthodox
doctrines and way of thinking. Indeed, Blake “remained deeply nervous
and resentful of any authority” throughout his entire life (Ackroyd 23).
He emphasizes this idea further by writing, “Thy Heaven doors are my Hell
Gates” (Blake 516). In this extreme statement, Blake implies that he would
be subject to eternal damnation if he believed in the institutional doctrines
of the church or the orthodox version of Christ. Damon writes, “In ethics,
[Blake’s] Jesus was and an out-and-out revolutionist” (WBHPS 128-9).
It can be seen in most of Blake’s work that Jesus takes on the same kind
of rebellious attitude against convention that Blake himself exhibits in his
writing.
According to Blake, Jesus comes to reshape the mind of humankind, not to affirm
the Jewish law. In “The Everlasting Gospel,” Blake shows his perception
of Jesus’ lack of gentility. According to Hamblen, “By gentleness
or gentility, Blake meant submissiveness; disposition to bow the knee to the
moral and the religious ideals of the time” (379). The following stanza
refers to Jesus:
"Throughout the land he took
his course
And traced diseases to their source
He cursd the Scribe and Pharisee
Trampling down Hypocrisy
Where e[v]er his Chariot took its way
There Gates of Death let in the day
Broke down from every Chain and Bar." (Blake 515)
It can here be seen that Jesus comes to rid humankind of the diseases that Satan
created that are holding down their minds and bodies. He rids these diseases
from the Spirit of God. He takes his words and teachings everywhere; he speaks
out without cowardice. He diminishes the power of those supporting Jewish Law
who could not uphold it in their own life by pointing out their hypocrisy. He
condemns those who blame others for their transgressions. Wherever Christ took
his Word, he broke down death and the law. He “is the remover of limits,
and the resurrection from the dead” (Beer 251).
Blake illustrates the office of Divine humanity through Jesus’ example
of humility before God and haughtiness towards man. He says that the pride Jesus
possessed allowed him to curse rulers in both the religious and political establishment
of his day. It enabled him to confront and challenge the idea of men over men
while affirming equality of all.
"God wants not Man to Humble
himself
This is the trick of the ancient Elf
This is the Race that Jesus ran
Humble to God Haughty to Man
Cursing the rulers before the People
Even to the temples highest Steeple." (Blake 511)
God does not want man to be humble unto other men. Blake believed such a posture
was presented by “the ancient elf,” or Satan. Although “humility
is considered a great virtue in all authoritarian religions, as it means submission
to the authorities, Blake hated it, because it means the sacrifice of the God
within man, the sin against the Holy Ghost. Forced Humility is spiritual murder”
(Damon, ABD 191). For Blake, humility towards other men is doubt, the greatest
and only sin that man can commit against God. Blake insisted that instead of
being humble, humankind must recognize its true nature as God, and follow Jesus’
example: proudly unveiling eternal truths while denouncing the religious laws
and traditions of the establishment. Accordingly, “humility involves a
failure to recognize one’s own eternal identity and so leads to doubt”
(Beer 285). Thus, humility is going against Jesus while falling under the oppression
of men. In an annotation to Lavater’s Aphorisms on Man, Blake
says that Christ was what Lavater called “the greatest of characters …
who, free from all trifling accidental helps, could see objects through one
grand immutable medium, always at hand” (Blake 573). In other words, he
would spontaneously reveal eternity by the use of his imaginative faculty in
everything he did. This is what Blake believes every Divine human should do.
Beyond this, he believed that humanity should denounce all religious authorities,
as Jesus denounced the Jewish religious authority. In the lines that follow,
Blake says that Jesus would have gone against God…
"If he had been Antichrist Creeping
Jesus
He’d have done any thing to please us
Gone sneaking into Synagogues
And not usd the Elders and Priests like dogs
But Humble as a Lamb or Ass
Obeyd himself to Caiaphas." (Blake 511)
In this passage, Blake negatively implies that Jesus did not try to please anyone
by saying what he or she wanted to hear. He suggests that Jesus did not humble
himself to the Jewish or Roman authorities, represented by “Caiaphas”
and the “Synagogues,” but treated them like dogs. He affirms that
Jesus did not obey any man other than his own true man, the Poetic Genius, or
God. For Blake, “the spirit behind this is not blasphemy. It was the fierce
bitterness of his attack on the false god worshipped under the divine name”
(Damon, WBHPS 129). In “A Vision of the Last Judgment,” Blake writes,
“The Modern Church Crucifies Christ with the Head Downwards” (Blake
554). Thus, in Blake’s experience, it is the Christian authority (or any
other power structure) that undermines imaginative vision. Blake suggests that
humankind must live as God by truthfully following the Poetic Genius while not
allowing the established authorities to get in the way.
Yet there is one form of Jesus’ humility that Blake can respect and laud.
Blake’s work can never be seen as a dichotomy, only a unity (Frye, FSSWB
346). Therefore, Blake does not contradict himself in denouncing Jesus’
humility in one respect, while praising it in another. The humility that is
acceptable for Blake is that which is directed towards God. But when humanity
humbles itself to God, He humbles Himself to humanity at the same time, for
God is humanity:
"And when he Humbled himself
to God
Then descended the Cruel Rod
If thou humblest thyself thou humblest me
Thou also dwellst in Eternity
Thou art a Man God is no more
For thy own humanity learn to adore
For that is my Spirit of Life." (Blake 511)
The “Cruel Rod” that descends when Christ humbles himself to God
is a lightening rod, the symbol for awakening. This awakening was Jesus’
realization of his true self. Blake suggests that when Jesus humbles himself
to God, God is humbled to humankind, bringing all men to a state of eternal
life. For, as Blake does, to accept “Jesus as the fullness of both God
and Man entails the rejection of all attributes of divinity which are not human”
(Frye, FSSWB 32). The tone of the following may seem negative: “If thou
humblest thyself thou humblest me;” however, this is only the case for
an orthodox believer. By humbling Himself, God becomes the eternal-loving forgiver
who no longer concerns Himself with vengeance. He takes the form of a human
being in Jesus, then subsequently in all of humankind. He is no longer a being
out in heaven somewhere away from humanity but a being who is humanity itself.
This is why Blake can say that Jesus taught us to worship the best of humanity:
“Real worship consists of honoring God’s gifts in … poets
pure and simple, who have the courage to take their imaginings as truths …
each according to his genius, and loving the greatest men best” (Damon,
WBHPS 89). Indeed, Erdman claims that Blake called “to those who worship
Christ to love him as the greatest man and to honor God’s gifts in all
men” (BPAE 160). Honoring God’s gifts in humanity is honoring God
in the greatest way. To envision these gifts in humanity is to see True Man,
which at the same time is to see God. The True Man, the Christ, or Humanity,
is God’s Spirit of Life under the influence of imaginative vision.
Finally, Blake writes about the legacy that Jesus left for humanity after his
death and resurrection. He shows that Jesus died proudly for the Spirit of every
man. He suggests that in death, Jesus did away with the prominence of the material
world and in His resurrection, he brought about an eternal Spiritual life for
all humanity:
"But when Jesus was Crusified
Then was perfected his glittering pride
In three Nights he devoured his prey
And still he devours the Body of Clay
For dust and Clay is the Serpents meat
Which never was made for Man to Eat." (Blake 514)
Blake’s
Jesus devoured his prey, he devours the material world, so that all can be lit
in the Spiritual light that he came to show to all. He confined “the physical
impulses and activities to their sphere – the Body; refusing to allow
them to color His intellectual [Spiritual] perceptions” (Hamblen 381).
The wording of the above passage shows that the process continues today and
is not yet complete. According to Northrup Frye, Blake’s Jesus is “a
compelling Word who continually recreates an unconscious floundering universe
into something with beauty and intelligence. The Son and the Holy Spirit are
therefore the same thing. And this Son or Spirit is also the universal Man who
is the unified form of our scattered imaginations, and which we visualize as
a Father” (FSSWB 52). In other words, Christ lives forever bringing eternity
to all souls. For, as Blake writes in “A Vision of the Last Judgment,”
“All Beams from him [<Because> as he himself has said All dwells
in him] He is the Bread and the Wine he is the Water of Life accordingly”
(Blake 551). Humanity was only meant to eat the Spiritual bread and wine of
Christ; it was never meant to eat of the material world, or live off of the
material world. If the need to eat only Spiritual bread, or only live in Spiritual
reality, and the need to dispose of reliance on the material reality is seen
as a problem, then the problem “of restoring man to his original sphere,
is … the problem of opening man’s Spirit again to the world of vision”
(White 190-191). Blake accentuates this point by harshly referring to the material
world as “prey” that must be “devoured.” He says that
Jesus died and was resurrected so that we might be saved; so that the problems
of the material world might be done away with. He resurrects in every heart
and soul that is born again in the Spirit. In other words, He lives in the hearts
and souls of those who understand the Word, or those who see with clear vision;
for, “when [their] imagination[s] become possessed by the Jesus of the
resurrection, [they join] the pure community of a Divine Man, [or] the absolute
civilization of the City of God” (Frye, FSSWB 389). This idea is emphasized
in “A Vision of the Last Judgment:” “Jesus is surrounded by
Beams of Glory in which are seen all around him Infants emanating from him[.]
These represent the Eternal Births of Intellect from the divine Humanity”
(Blake 552). The image of infants emanating from Jesus illustrates Blake’s
idea that when people are reborn in Jesus, or when Jesus resurrects in their
hearts, they can more easily imagine reality to be of a Spiritual nature.
Therefore, Blake’s God is humanity’s greatest potential. Jesus was
the True Man who brought this message to humanity. And now, Blake would say
that it is up to humanity to recognize its true essence so that it can empower
itself to bring the Kingdom of Heaven down to Earth. Yet, the Kingdom of Heaven
is down on earth for the imaginative visionary, or the artist. Those who live
with a cleansed perception, as Blake would say in his “Marriage of Heaven
and Hell,” live in the Kingdom of Heaven in the Eternal Now. The present
is the only reality for Blake. He says that it is our duty to recognize the
Spirit of God that is life in this reality. Correspondingly, “Blake was
the most thorough of anthropocentrists: heaven and hell and ‘all deities’
are within man; heaven consists of his capacities fulfilled, hell of his capacities
denied, and God, created in man’s image, is the sum of all his potentialities”
(Schorer 108). Perhaps the only amendment needed to this quote is that since
God and man are one, and God is the greater concept, humanity must be created
in God’s image. This is truly what Blake believed; yet, Schorer writes
the way he does to emphasize the radical nature of Blake’s beliefs. Truly,
Blake was a Christian Heterodox.
.......[Back to Blake Thesis Home Page].......[On to Chapter Two]